Hi Everyone! My dad and I had been discussing our assignment to lead a discussion about choosing a different name for Washington County Peak Oil and defining our mission. We thought we should work on defining our mission before we did the actual renaming. Here's stuff we would appreciate everyone to think about:
On our home page we have this as our mission:
As a group of concerned local citizens with diverse backgrounds and interests, motivated by an awareness of the looming crisis caused by the peaking of world petroleum supplies and by a hopeful vision of future possibilities, we have come together to:
• Create awareness in Washington County about the peak oil crisis and it's economic, environmental and social implications.
• Serve as a community network to identify and share individual and collective strategies to effectively cope with the peak oil crisis.
• Influence policies of local governments for constructive and sustainable solutions.
On July 1st, Peter wrote:
One of the key goals of Washington County Peak Oil is to motivate positive changes in the County and among our citizens to reduce our risks from energy depletion. In that context, this forum is dedicated to putting forth realistic ideas that will will:
1) Reduce petroleum consumption by local citizens, and
2) Be realistically achievable.
In the forum, there are posts about:
-Sustainable Population
-Creating a lifeboat community
-Backyard gardening
-Greening our local governments
-Pollution credits
-Recycling
-Food storage
.... and a lot of other stuff.
I think we will get more done if we narrow our focus and set measurable goals. Everyone in WCPO is intelligent, motivated, dedicated, hardworking. I love the energy. I'm sure we can do anything but, we need to focus all our energy and talent on one thing. We need to choose a mountain and conquer it.
Please think about what I've written and post your answer to the following:
-What is the purpose of WCPO?
-Why does WCPO exist?
October 22nd, 2008
Hi Ivy! Thank you for this
Hi Ivy!
Thank you for this post. I agree that bringing more focus to the group will aid in its effectiveness. I applaud your efforts to that end!
Let us not get discouraged, though, regardless of attempted yet unmet measurables, since one of our purposes is the establishment of a community network. That goal will occur no matter our achievements so long as we spend time engaging with one another both online, and especially, in-person.
The more specific we can be in choosing our mountains to conquer, though, I agree, the more wholly effective we will be in meeting our goals.
-Tim
September 15th, 2008
Hi Everybody, I'm more of a
Hi Everybody,
I'm more of a lurker than anything due to my family and volunteer responsibilities, however I am wanting to move towards living sustainably. I have have started to do some smallish things on my own via the Sustainability on a Budget class recommendations (www.sustainablebudget.com). I *really* appreciate the hard work, innovative thought, and smart use of technology by those who have formed this group.
I also really appreciate WCPO's focus on educating and "creating awareness" in the general population, and I sense that in particular that this is Peter's heartfelt mission. He is so skilled at it! I note that Donna has taken additional steps in utilizing her skills to facilitate discussion through the book group. It is clear that Peter and Donna have really stepped up to the plate to educate themselves, organize themselves and perform outreach to others -- to share what they know and hopefully inspire the rest of us. There are doubtless others in this group who are doing a lot and I have not had the chance to know them.
So it appears to me that the group has been primarily engaged in educating others at individual, governmental and societal levels. Perhaps it has been less involved in actively organizing others to build a community of people living in a certain way, as the Seattle group seems to want to do. Yet, there is only so much that a handful of people can do!
So towards clarifying a mission statment, for what it's worth, it seems to me that WCPO currently does two main things:
1. Learn
2. Attempt to create widespread awareness through education, connecting people, and facilitating discussion.
I think that if there were enough people with the inclination *and this would take at least several committed folks* there could also be a third something along the lines of Seattle's mission statement:
#3. Create a neighborhood, village, or community of people actively working to apply life skills and knowledge, to live as sustainably and free of energy inputs as possible, and to share best practices with others.
Peter has really begun to put this third thing in motion by detailing for us his biontensive gardening experiment. We are really lucky that he is doing this: biontensive gardening is truly cutting edge (though individuals in France have been doing it for years calling it something else, it is not widely known and practiced). In my view, biontensive gardening, which yields much more food per area -- and this is key -- yields it sustainably -- along with permaculture design -- may be an key factor in transitioning towards an energy scarce future. There are not many folk actually doing it and helping others do it.
Peter's garden is near my house; I am hoping to find a way to go help Peter and learn from him since he said it would be ok. I have no interest in getting any of his food -- just in learning!!! Perhaps others interested in the #3 goal might be also be interested in helping and learning, if Peter would welcome the help, or be interested in having company while he does his thing.
If this outsider perspective helps in any way I'll be glad it did!
September 22nd, 2008
Thank you for Your Thoughts
Julia- (Nolagal) -- Thank you so much for writing. I hope you can make future meetings with us. Appreciated your fresh perspective and observations that we have worked hard on educating ourselves and others including both citizens and those in government.
I think that we in WCPO find the idea of a closer knit community very attractive but we realize we all live quite a ways from each other and that is not going to change any time soon. So yes, at least at this time preparation would be about finding our own communities closer to each of our homes, and about continuing ot meet to learn and develop ideas and knowledge. I really think many of us have a pretty long range vision about what we have to offer both now and into the future as the world we know changes, probably quite dramatically.
September 11th, 2008
Purpose and Existence
Ivy,
Thanks so very much for starting this discussion on our Forum page. I hope multiple members participate actively.
You asked two questions and I'll try to share my two-cents on them both (and invite all members to chime in their corrections, dissent, or other relevant comments here).
We started the group in 2007, initially to get people together to talk about the problem of peak oil. At the time, it was a barely heard-of issue and only a few people were actually aware of it, or its' implications. So we wanted to get those people together to hold intelligent discussions on peak oil, and to support each other. (Once one has assimilated that peak oil is very real, and imminent, they see the whole world in a different way -- everything is different, and they need others to talk to who understand what they are even talking about.)
We quickly decided to organize the group and had several meetings to discuss essentially these same two questions you have raised -- What is the purpose of WCPO and What will WCPO do?
We defined and adopted the mission statement and a vision statement in June of 2007 (I can't seem to find a copy of the Vision statement at the moment but will keep looking) and publicly launched the organization in July of 2007. Overall we essentially decided to become an educational outreach organization with a focus on raising awareness about peak oil across the County, and influencing both citizens and local governments to take realistic actions to deal with the consequences of imminent energy depletion.
As I stated earlier, very few people knew anything about it and the problem was urgent. So, what we've done to date is:
General Public
Government Education (Washington County)
Today, probably 80% or more of County residents now know there is a problem...that something is amiss with oil and energy (obviously, high gas prices are a big clue), but they don't yet understand the real causes behind it, or the implications, or relevant approaches to protect themselves from the risks presented by the problem.
Fortunately, the Presidential election has brought much of the energy problem to the forefront of national dialog, but it is still mostly couched in terms of being a "terrorist" threat -- by sending our money overseas to people who don't like us very much. People, in general, simply don't grasp that the real cause of the problem is that the planet has peaked on oil production and the consequence is that we will have less and less each month going forward...., and that's going to affect everything we depend upon for our current lifestyles very quickly, including our food supplies.
So our focus to date has been on educating various groups on the real problem, many of its consequences, and providing multiple steps citizens can take individually to reduce the future impact to their lives. (This website is an example of that -- there are numerous ideas on these pages.) So now that people know there is an energy problem, regardless of its cause, it seems to make sense to me to focus our efforts more on solutions than on educating the public about the real causes of the problem. It is also fundamentally important for those of us who know each other to become a mutual support group, a "community", to help each other out as things get tough in the future.
Comments?
September 12th, 2008
Some thoughts
Ivy, Nathan, and Peter -- Thank you for all your good points. I've been thinking about it since reading them last evening. What you said, Ivy, about all our activities being quite diverse, and perhaps we need one main focus, is a very good observation. It was pretty apparent at the meeting, too, that in talking about our name, the mission and purpose of our group becomes the first question really fast. After a year+ of being around, regrouping and thinking about what we are seems healthy for us.
I've gotten a little acquainted with Seattle's group which is part of the post-carbon institute too. Below is their mission statement, which seems to be a little more succinct than ours:
"Seattle Peak Oil Awareness is a local citizen group seeking to develop more resiliency against the problems we face due to the lack of available cheap energy. SPOA has a vision of creating a "small town within the city" to address the needs of its members in post-peak oil society. Members are actively working to turn that vision into a reality.
We recommend three areas of focus for a beginner:
Get Out of Debt
Grow & Store Food
Generate & Store Energy"
Yet I find one thing about such a topic as peak oil, is that it becomes a very broad subject with a little investigation, and oil issues interplay with essentially everything: history, governments, war, poverty, environment, economy, power, lifestyle, culture, industry, food, religion, medicine and on and on. While Seattle has a tidier focus on helping each other out, they also describe the ff. about themselves:
"Seattle Peak Oil Awareness is a local citizens action network offering information and practical ideas for living in a time of reduced energy availability. Working in small, focused groups we advocate healthy, sustainable living choices for all interested residents in the Puget Sound region.
What we are working on now:
1) Outreach and education: We are presenting information about peak oil and relocalization at various sustainability forums and fairs in the greater Seattle area. Our next event is the Sustainable Ballard festival on October 1. Also, we have drafted a resolution for the City of Seattle to catalyze local government and public planning for peak oil. We intend to present this resolution to the City Council in the near future.
2) We are beginning to grapple with implementing “lifeboat” strategies and finding practical ways to build lifeboats."
And I see in the above the areas that seem to show up over and over again in peak oil type groups: educating ourselves and others, influencing government, and preparation.
I'm just brainstorming here and not trying to come to any conclusions. But there is a tension between 1.) as a group really needing to focus on perhaps one thing, like Ivy states, or perhaps a few good things, so we know what we are up to and 2.) being involved in a concern that is huge with many, many aspects to it.
One thing occuring to me as I write this, and express my liking a simpler statement like what Seattle has to offer, is that we can drop the idea in our mission of being a community network for resources, and develop a mission a bit simpler and a more effective way for us, which would be about educating ourselves and othes, influencing government, and preparation.
September 14th, 2008
Ideas about our own mission statement
Dear everyone: further thoughts about our mission statement, based on the discussion so far in our forum here:
Looking at our mission statement for Washington County, as ff.:
“As a group of concerned local citizens, with diverse backgrounds and interests, motivated by an awareness of the looming crisis caused by the peaking of world petroleum supplies and by a hopeful vision of future possibilities, we have come together to do the following:
• Create awareness in Washington County about the peak oil crisis and it's economic, environmental and social implications.
• Serve as a community network to identify and share individual and
collective strategies to effectively cope with the peak oil crisis.
• Influence policies of local governments for constructive and sustainable
solutions.”
I wonder if we can take the best of both factors: simplicity of purpose, multiplicity of facts, and be more clear what we are about.
1. Maybe change “creating awareness” to educating ourselves and others.
2. Perhaps eliminate the part about being a community network and simply change it to “preparation,” which, since we advocate community, will involve strengthening relations in neighborhoods and communities.
3. Influence policies of government already sound pretty good, maybe change just to government, and not just local.
(Even the first sentence about our being a group of citizens could be simplified.)
Then we can be clearer on what we do –educate, influence, prepare. And from there, have our projects perhaps be more one at a time and well defined.
So that's my thoughts for now.
Donna