It's a concept that a lovely woman named, Laura Strohm from the Sustainability Academy, asked me during lunch this past week. Is it possible to have "sustainable growth"? I am thinking about this and would love feed back from anyone who cares to comment. As for myself, I reacted with a strong, "No!", like it was a question in need of a venomous response... but as I think about indigenous cultures, I think they lived on this Earth without growth problems...(honestly, that's a presumption... I really don't know, but I think they lived and do live without this issue...) The difference between our industrial society and a society more intune with the natural world, is that they follow pricinples of the natural world and death is apart of the cycle. Can we have sustainalbe growth if we allow death to occur more naturally?
Any thoughts?
decal
December 10th, 2007
no sustainable growth
We've overshot the planet's carrying capacity by 3x to 12x depending on which estimates you like. That means four billion dead before their time is through as a minimum and they aren't going to go quietly into the night, so those under stress likely get neighbors on the way down :-(
Growth is dead. We have a desperate need for focused optimization of what we have left, but no virtual person corporation makes $BUGBUCKS by that process ...
December 6th, 2005
Sustainable Growth
December 8th, 2005
Carrying capacity falls as fuel costs rise.
November 22nd, 2005
Sustainable Growth is an Oxymoron
November 30th, 2005
And so, growth is ultimately unsustainable & decline inevitable
December 1st, 2005
Adapt
November 22nd, 2005
In the context of carrying capacity or economics