Inter Press Service News Agency
Friday, December 22, 2006 22:06 GMT

CHALLENGES 2006-2007:
The Climate Change Tipping Point? http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=35886
Stephen Leahy
BROOKLIN, Canada, Dec 18 (IPS) - This was the year that most people in the U.S. and Canada began to take climate change seriously and express hope that their governments would take action to reduce emissions -- but it is unclear if they will take action themselves.
Last month, thousands of people stood outside electronics stores for three, four and more days and nights to be the first to spend 600 dollars for the latest electronic video game console, but how many would spend two hours protesting the inaction of their governments on climate change?
"There is increasing public support for action but I'm not sure there's a willingness to do anything," said Eileen Claussen of the Pew Centre on Global Climate Change, a U.S. environmental think-tank working with business leaders and policymakers.
The David Suzuki Foundation launched such a programme four years ago called the Nature Challenge. It asks people to sign up and commit to taking action on the 10 most effective ways to reduce emissions and protect nature. These include reducing home energy by 10 percent; walking, biking or taking public transit to regular destinations; eating meat-free meals once a week; and choosing energy-efficient homes and appliances. More than 238,000 people have joined the programme, which also provides monthly tips on making sustainable choices.
"Canadians are willing to make modifications in their lifestyles -- hundreds join the programme every week," Carter said.
However, to achieve the deep cuts that many scientists say are needed -- 80 percent by 2050 -- major industries that are responsible for more than half of Canada's emissions have to play a significant role. Emissions caps are the best and fairest way to do that, Carter says. And it need not be costly. Canada's oil and gas sector, which is making billions of dollars in profits, could become carbon-neutral at a cost of only pennies per barrel of oil, studies have shown.
However, Canada's government has made it clear that it prefers voluntary measures.
...
Germany will provide stiff competition in the emissions cuts race with a recent proposal to reduce emissions by 40 percent by 2020 if the European Union (EU) takes on a target of 30 percent.
"These are extremely ambitious targets but there is a great deal of activity in the EU to move away from importing oil and gas to domestic renewable energy programmes," Pearce said.
The EU believes it should show leadership and set the standard for rapidly industrialising countries like India and China to follow, said Pearce.
Meanwhile, many politicians in the United States and Canada complain that they shouldn't have to do anything unless India and China make commitments of their own.
"The world community is exasperated with Canada's and the U.S.'s irresponsible attitude," Pearce concluded. (FIN/2006)

Comments
December 27th, 2006
re: reduce carbon emissions
As a friend from below the 49th, I found it rather odd that the Liberal Government chose to have Rick Mercer promote the One Tonne Challenge. He is not to be taken seriously, and I think that is the message the Liberal Government sent about Kyoto.
Now that the Conservatives are in power the Rick Mercer Report was in Alberta showing how cool the earth moving equipment for the tar sands are and voicing the dubious fact that there is a trillion barrels of oil there without mentioning that the boreal forest that the tars sit upon is one of Canada's last carbon sink.
I applaud the efforts of David Suzuki and think the Liberal Government would have done much better using someone like David Suzuki.
As for our own governments dismal record, I can only hang my head in shame and do what I can on a personal level.
December 27th, 2006
Canadian Record on climate a shame, but we're all to blame
I took a blunt object and gave it to my wife for Xmas: no, not a weapon or a kitchen utensil, but George Monbiot's new book "Heat, How to stop the planet from burning." She has been living with this closeted plaintif voice for 'relocalization' and energy descent for about a year now. It has not made our household the epitome of bliss, let me just say that much.
But the book is an eloquent 'pull your eyesight up above your navel' and aim for the truth wherever it leads. Of course it leads to a 90% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030, most of which has to happen earlier than later.
And to your point, the Canadian record. In the preface to the Canadian edition, Monbiot disembowels Canadian boyscoutism on energy sustainability, no matter how quaintly we care to define it.
Monbiot has redlined a lesson for ourselves and other nations here. The national psyche cannot ignore the end of the ride of oil and knows tough medicine is called for, but it will avoid taking that medicine, even knowing this is suicide. The psychological lederdemain is to insist on tough targets from our leaders (which the Liberals copped to), content in the knowing that the government will not activate or enforce them. Hence conscience appeased, we did the right thing, and darn, we just couldn't quite make the deadline. Honour intact. And we all take the HEAT.
This will take a similar form under current governments, Monbiot warns. Our sharp-tongued advocacy is essential, even if it's 'social suicide' as highschoolers label anything uncool. Not just typing on this keyboard either, but in the streets, in people's faces.
Here is one urban planner's summary. The full ppt and notes are on http://www.atlanticplanners.org/Events/Conferences/2006%20Conference/200...
Ten Principles of Post Oil-Peak Planning
Atlantic Planners’ Institute Annual Conference
Saint John, New Brunswick
October 20, 2006
Tim Moerman
Greater Moncton Planning District Commission
Ten Principles of Post Oil-Peak Planning
1. The laws of thermodynamics: no free lunch, death and taxes.
2. Protect arable land at all costs. (And don’t waste it growing biodiesel.)
3. Moving stuff around is really hard. The basic purpose of a city is to avoid doing so.
4. Every new development should pass the $500-A-Barrel Test.
5. Globalization was a flash in the pan. Peak Oil will drive re-localization.
6. Adaptation is 90% conservation. We will use a lot less energy, period.
7. Electricity is omnivorous and adaptable. There’ll never be much, but (almost) always something.
8. Perform triage and palliative care on areas that cannot or will not adapt.
9. Prepare both a long-range plan and an emergency plan.
10. Paradigms change overnight. Be ready for it!
And let's start planting those food gardens in front yards everywhere!
Ian in Burlington
"Respect all Life. Reject violence. Share with others. Listen to understand. Preserve the planet. Rediscover solidarity."
www.unesco.org/manifesto2000