Small steps yet... but the City of Montreal appears to be seriously considering (again) a rail link to Dorval airport and the West Island - and Lachine is seeking to revive a tram line to downtown. (Tram-train link to West Island studied; http://tinyurl.com/3e2ltu ).
I'm all for the tram line, as I feel it could do a lot to reduce congestion in the downtown area. But is the Dorval train not just in time for a PO-induced reduction in air travel? Should we be encouraging more investment in the high-speed rail line between Montreal and TO (Quebec-Windsor)? Justin Bur of Transport 2000 Canada suggests the latter, but he seems to be walking carefully near the question of air feasibility.
"What the population [in this corridor] is not sufficient for, however, is building high-speed rail while also retaining all the air traffic. Airlines and politicians are legitimately worried about the risk of destabilizing the fragile Canadian air transport system. The way out of this problem is not for lobbyists to block high-speed rail, but rather for airlines to negotiate favorable terms for using high-speed trains to transport passengers bearing airline tickets. This is common practice in Western Europe and of benefit to traveller and airline alike." See http://tinyurl.com/2sqgcf .
Is anyone familiar with the European arrangements in this regard?
February 23rd, 2008
European air/rail intermodality
I'm the author of the letter to the Gazette. When I wrote about airlines using rail services as part of their network, I was thinking of the following examples:
There are other examples, and there is even a literature on the subject. See for example Potential and limitations of air-rail links – a general overview (2004), by Andreas Eichinger and Andreas Knorr of Universität Bremen, which includes a bibliography.
Justin Bur, Montréal